SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1524

JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Sanjeev Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Naveen Gupta, Mr. Shiva Khurmi, Mr. Judge Singh

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks bail under cr.p.c. for alleged enticement. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner's defense claims false implication and police misconduct. (Para 3 , 5)
3. court emphasizes the right to liberty and police accountability. (Para 6 , 8)
4. court allows bail under certain conditions. (Para 7)

Judgment

Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, J.

The petitioner through instant petition under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’) is seeking concession of regular bail in FIR No.241 dated 21.10.2022 under Section 346 of INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (for Short ‘IPC’) [ Sections 363 , 366, 366-A IPC added later on and Section 346 of IPC deleted later on while filing challan] registered at Police Station Haibowal, District Ludhiana.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 21.1 0.2022, Bhanu Parkash-complainant made a statement alleging that he has two sisters aged 17 and 14 years, respectively. He received a telephonic call from his father at about 05:30 PM that both his sisters had gone for shopping but have not returned. He suspects that his sisters have been concealed at some place by some unknown persons. FIR came to be registered. On 16.11.2022, in the supplementa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top