SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1506

ARUN MONGA
Santosh – Appellant
Versus
Kanta Devi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Sumit Sangwan

Table of Content
1. overview of the factual background of the case. (Para 2)
2. arguments regarding the significance of contract timing and limitations. (Para 3)
3. court's observations on potential harm and property rights. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. conclusion and order regarding the case disposition. (Para 7 , 8)

Judgment

Mr. Arun Monga, J.

Petition herein is for setting aside order dated 17.03.2023(Annexure P-1) passed by Ld. Additional District Judge, Bhiwani, whereby Ld. First Appellate Court dismissed the application, moved by petitioner/defendant, under Order 41 Rule 5 CPC for staying operation of impugned judgment and decree dated 30.01.2020 (Annexure P-2) during pendency of first appeal.

2. Succinct facts first, as pleaded in the instant petition.

2.1. Respondents filed a suit for possession by way of specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 03.03.2010 allegedly executed by petitioner in favour of Ompal Singh, predecessor-in-interest of respondent/plaintiffs, agreeing to sell land measuring 12 Kanals. The suit was filed on 08.12.2017 i.e. after about 7 years from the alleged agreement. Ld. trial Court decreed the suit vide judgment and decree dated 30.01.2020 (Annexure P-2).

2.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top