SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1453

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Amarjot Bhatti, J.
Raman Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
CRA-S No. 1163 of 2021
Decided On : 02-03-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Surinder Sharma, Mr. M.S. Joshi AAG, Punjab

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 376 and 457 - Appeal against conviction for sexual assault - Appellant convicted of rape and house-trespass - Prosecution's case revolved around testimony of the prosecutrix, who changed her statement regarding the assailant's accomplice, raising doubts about her credibility. (Paras 1-12)

(B) Legal Principles of Evidence - Sole testimony of the prosecutrix may suffice for conviction but must be reliable - Court emphasized the necessity of corroborating evidence in cases of sexual assault, especially when the prosecutrix has motives affecting her testimony, as seen here. (Paras 10-13)

Facts of the case:
The prosecutrix, a dancer, alleged that the appellant raped her at her residence while her daughter was taken away by an accomplice. The incident allegedly occurred on 22.09.2016, and the FIR was lodged the following day. Appellant argued that the prosecutrix's inconsistent statements and lack of supporting evidence undermined the case.

Findings of Court:
The court noted the improbability and contradictions in the prosecutrix's testimony and the absence of corroborating evidence. The appeal was deemed justified.

Issues: Whether the prosecutrix's inconsistent statements compromised the integrity of her testimony regarding the appellant's guilt and whether the prosecution met its burden of proof.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the prosecution failed to prove the appellant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt due to the prosecutrix's contradictory statements and lack of corroborative evidence, warranting acquittal.

Result: Appeal allowed; conviction set aside, and appellant acquitted.

Table of Content
1. overview of case and charges (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. prosecution evidence presented (Para 4 , 5)
3. arguments from appellant and state (Para 8 , 9)
4. court's reasoning on evidence and testimony (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. conclusion and acquittal of appellant (Para 13)

Judgment

Mrs. Amarjot Bhatti, J.

The appellant — Raman Kumar has filed the instant appeal against the judgment of conviction dated 07.09.2021 and order of sentence dated 08.09.2021 in FIR No.136 dated 23.09.2016 under Section 376 of IPC, Police Station Maqsudan, District Jalandhar vide which he has been convicted and sentenced under Section 376 IPC to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 7 years and to pay fine of Rs.50,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 6 months and under Section 457 IPC to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 5 years and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 6 months.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the prosecutrix gave her statement to the police that she was residing as tenant in street Pehalwan Randhawa, village Masanda, PS Maksoodan, District Jalandhar. She was a dancer by profession. She got married 10 years ago with Mangat Ram. However, due to matrimonial dispute she started residing separately along with her daughter for the last about 3-4 years. On 21.09.2016 at about 10.30 PM she was present in the house along with her daughter Navyya when Raman, who was also working as dancer with her, came to her house along with his friend in drunkard condition. He was turned out of the house. Thereafter she slept in the room along with her daughter. On 22.09.2016 at about 1.30 am (midnight) Raman Kumar along with his friend entered her house by scaling the wall. His friend took her daughter to the roof top of the house and Raman forcibly committed rape with her. She could not raise alarm as her mouth was closed while he raped her. Due to fear she could not raise her voice later-on. Thereafter, she narrated this incident to her friend Varinderjit Kaur. The prosecutrix along with her friend lodged the complaint and prayed for action against Raman Kumar. The investigation was handed over to SI Atamjit Singh. On the basis of this complaint present FIR was registered. Later-on the prosecutrix gave her supplementary statement that on 21/22.09.2016 only Raman Kumar had come and raped her. Raman Kumar was arrested on 07.02.2017. The entire investigation was completed. The medical record was collected.

3. After completion of investigation, the challan was prepared and copy thereof was supplied to the accused Raman Kumar. The offence under Section 376 IPC was exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions, therefore, vide order dated 06.04.2017 the case was committed to the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Jalandhar. After hearing arguments advanced by learned Additional Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the accused the charge-sheet was initially framed under Section 376 IPC on 01.06.2017 and subsequently the amended charge-sheet was framed under Sections 376 and 457 IPC on 14.11.2018.

4. In order to prove the facts of the case the prosecution examined Bharti - mother of the prosecutrix as PW1, the prosecutrix herself as PW2, Amrit Lal landlord of the prosecutrix as PW3, Dr. Sukhwinder Singh, Emergency Medical Officer who medically examined the accused as PW- 4, Dr. Birinder Kaur Medical Officer who medically examined the prosecutrix as PW-5, the Investigating Officer SI Atamjit Singh as PW-6, ASI Rajinder Kumar the carrier of parcel as PW-7, ASI Gurjit Singh who handed over the sealed parcels to HC Rajinder Kumar as PW8, Ms. Parminder Kaur, Judicial Magistrate 1st Class who recorded the statement of victim under Section 164 Cr.P.C. as PW9, Lady Constable Baljit Kaur as PW-10, ASI Manjit Singh as PW-11, Navya minor daughter of the prosecutrix as PW12, Varinderjit Kaur friend of the prosecutri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top