HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Major Singh @ Major – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual groundwork of the case (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. contentions raised by counsel regarding non bailable warrants (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. procedural requirements for issuing warrants and implications of non-compliance (Para 6 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. judicial caution in issuing non-bailable warrants (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. conditions necessary for issuing proclamations under section 82 (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. procedural safeguards in forfeiting bonds under section 446 (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. mandatory compliance with statutes for protecting personal liberty (Para 29 , 30) |
| 8. final conclusion ordering reinstatement of bail (Para 33 , 34) |
Judgment
Mr. Harpreet Singh Brar, J.
The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) for quashing of impugned order dated 20.12.2022 (Annexure P-5) passed by trial Court whereby the bail bond and the surety bonds of the petitioner has been cancelled and forefeited to the State and non bailable warrants have been issued against him in case FIR No.52 dated 15.07.2018, under Section 21 /22 of NDPS Act, 1985, registered at Police Station Mehta, District Amritsar.
2. As per al
Anuradha Bhasin Vs. Union of India 2020 3 SCC 637
Inder Mohan Goswami v. State of Uttaranchal
Narata Ram Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Raghuvansh Dewanchand Bhasin v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. (2012) 9 SCC 791
Raghuvansh Dewanchand Bhasin v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. 2011 4 R.C.R (Cri) 212
Raj Kishore Jha v. State of Bihar and Ors. 2003 7 Supreme 152
Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation 2023 1 SCC (Cri) 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.