Back
HARKESH MANUJA
Vikramjeet Singh @ Vicky – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations and charges in the fir (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for and against bail application (Para 3) |
| 3. court's analysis and reasoning for bail decision (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. order for bail granted (Para 7) |
Judgment
Mr. Harkesh Manuja, J.
By way of present petition filed under Section 439 CrPC, prayer has been made for grant of bail pending trial in case FIR No.102 dated 13.11.2021 registered under Sections 22 (c) and 61 of NDPS Act, 1985, P.S. Sadar Abohar, District Fazilka.
2. As per allegations levelled in FIR, the petitioner was implicated against the alleged recovery of 19500 Tramadol Hydrochloride Tablets.
3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in the present case, investigation already stands concluded with the filing of challan followed by framing of charges and only 2 witnesses have been examined out of total 11 witnesses as cited by the prosecution. He further submits that the petitioner has already suffered incarceration for a period of more than 1 year and 6 months. Learned counsel also submits that there is no other case pending against petitioner and he is not a habitual offender. 4. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the prayer made in t
The court may grant regular bail in cases involving significant drug recoveries based on factors such as prolonged incarceration, lack of other criminal cases under the NDPS Act, and likely trial del....
The court can relax bail provisions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act for first-time offenders even if the quantity is above the commercial threshold, considering procedural deficiencies.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
