SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1720

H. S. MADAAN
Ghasi Ram – Appellant
Versus
Gopal Inder (since deceased) through LRs – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Om Parkash Sharma, Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Mr. Daanish Mahajan

Judgment

Mr. H.S. Madaan, J.

Briefly stated facts of the case are that plaintiff Gopal Inder Singh, Surinder Singh sons and Amrit Kaur wife of late Surjit Inder Singh, had brought a suit against defendant Ghashi son of Sheo Chand, seeking possession of a plot fully detailed in headnote of the plaint, situated within revenue estate of Village Khera Khemawati, Tehsil Safidon, District Jind after ordering demolition of the ghair, khor and all other types of construction.

As per case of the plaintiffs, they are owners of the plot in dispute. In a suit earlier filed by defendant regarding this very plot, the Court of Sub Judge, Ist Class, had held the plaintiffs to be owners of the plot, however, the plaintiffs were asked to take possession of defendant in due course of law, vide judgment and decree dated 03.06.1983 upheld by Ist Appellate Court on 24.08.1984. The plot in dispute is in the shape of ghair and is in the front portion of the building of the plaintiffs. The water from house of plaintiffs flow through this side and there is an obstruction in the flow. The possession of defendant over the plot in dispute is unauthorized, therefore, he is liable to vacate the same.

2. On notice,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top