Back
SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI
Bhupinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eligibility and procedures for land allotment (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. legal implications of allotment and civil suit outcomes (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. parties' arguments regarding eviction orders (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's analysis of jurisdictional issues (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. court's conclusion and directions regarding allotment and eviction (Para 15) |
Judgment
Mr. Kuldeep Tiwari, J.
As common questions of law and facts arise in both these writ petitions, therefore, they are being decided and disposed of by this common judgment. For brevity, the facts are being extracted from CWP-25676-2019.
2. Initially, the writ petition, CWP-25676-2019, was filed by total nine petitioners, however, petitioner Nos. 4, 6, and, 8 chose to withdraw the petition, and, consequently, the writ petition qua these petitioners was ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn, vide order dated 30.09.2019. Therefore, this writ petition survives only qua petitioner Nos.1 to 3, 5, 7 and 9.
FACTUAL MATRIX
3. In pursuance of Rule 13-A of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Rules, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Rules of 1964’ for short), the Government of Punjab formulated a policy dated 17.04.2001, ther
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
