SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1719

SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI
Bhupinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Nandan Jindal, Mr. Maninder Singh DAG, Punjab, Mr. Gurmanpreet Singh, Mr. Vishal Goel

Judgment

Mr. Kuldeep Tiwari, J.

As common questions of law and facts arise in both these writ petitions, therefore, they are being decided and disposed of by this common judgment. For brevity, the facts are being extracted from CWP-25676-2019.

2. Initially, the writ petition, CWP-25676-2019, was filed by total nine petitioners, however, petitioner Nos. 4, 6, and, 8 chose to withdraw the petition, and, consequently, the writ petition qua these petitioners was ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn, vide order dated 30.09.2019. Therefore, this writ petition survives only qua petitioner Nos.1 to 3, 5, 7 and 9.

FACTUAL MATRIX

3. In pursuance of Rule 13-A of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Rules, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Rules of 1964’ for short), the Government of Punjab formulated a policy dated 17.04.2001, thereby empowering Gram Panchayats to, with the prior approval of the State Government, allot plots to landless/houseless workers, from shamlat deh land, vesting in the Gram Panchayat concerned, for construction of houses thereon by such persons. To carry out the above exercise of allotment of plots, the policy (supra) enunciates the calling of a meeting by the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top