SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1810

NAMIT KUMAR
Anjana – Appellant
Versus
Rajinder Kumar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. R.K. Bamal, Mr. Divanshu Jain

Judgment

Mr. Namit Kumar, J.

Instant revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 13.01.2023 (Annexure P-9) passed by the Court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chandigarh, whereby application filed by the plaintiff-petitioner under Order 18 Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC for allowing her to lead further evidence after framing additional issue No.1-A, has been dismissed.

2. Brief facts relevant for disposal of the present revision petition are that petitioner along with her mother filed a suit for declaration to the effect that alleged transfer deed dated 13.03.2009 executed by defendant No.2 in favour of defendant No.1-respondent is null and void and is a result of fraud and undue influence having no effect on the rights of the plaintiffs and is liable to be set aside and the plaintiffs are entitled to 50% share in House No.2351, Sector 44-C, Chandigarh, and for permanent injunction restraining defendant No.1-respondent from alienating, transferring in any manner, to any person, the House No.2351, Sector 44-C, Chandigarh, and for restraining the defendant from forcible, illegally dispossessing and interfering

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top