SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1805

NAMIT KUMAR
Darshan Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Sukhdev Singh @ Sukha Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Suresh Kumar Arya

Table of Content
1. petitioner's application history and preceding orders. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner's explanation for non-appearance. (Para 3)
3. court's evaluation of petitioner's conduct. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. denial of the revision petition due to lack of merit. (Para 7)

Judgment

Mr. Namit Kumar, J.

The challenge in the instant revision petition filed under Section 227 of the Constitution of India is to the order dated 16.01.2023 (Annexure P-6) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Amritsar, whereby 3rd application filed by the petitioner for the restoration of his application filed under Order 9 Rule 13 read with Section 151 CPC which was dismissed in default vide order dated 04.01.2017 (Annexure P-3) and for restoration of his 1st application filed for restoration of his application filed under Order 9 rule 13 read with Section 151 CPC which was dismissed in default on 30.09.2019 (Annexure P-4), has been dismissed.

2. The brief facts leading to the filing of the present petition as has been narrated in the petition are that respondents No.1 and 2/plaintiffs have filed a Civil Suit No.96338 of 2013 titled as ‘Sukhdev Singh and another Vs. Darshan Kaur and another’ on 28.0

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top