Back
VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Baldev Singh – Appellant
Versus
Major Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case involving a dispute over land ownership. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding the validity of the transfer deed and court fee requirement. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's consideration of prior arguments and ruling on the court fee adequacy. (Para 6 , 10) |
| 4. legal standards regarding court fees and declarations related to transfer deeds. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. conclusion dismissing the revision petition due to lack of merit. (Para 15 , 16) |
Judgment
Mr. Vikram Aggarwal, J.
The present revision petition assails the order dated 26.02.2021 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Mansa, vide which the application filed by the petitioner-defendant under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short ‘the CPC’) was dismissed.
2. The facts, as emanating from the revision petition, are that respondent-plaintiff-Major Singh, who is the real brother of the petitioner-defendant-Baldev Singh filed a suit for declaration to the effect that he was the owner in possession of land measuring 16 Kanals 7 Marlas situated at Village Dhalewan, Tehsil and District Mansa (hereinafter referred to as the land in dispute) and that the petitioner-defendant had no concer
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
