Back
VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Rajnish – Appellant
Versus
Suman – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim of ownership and dispute over property. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. appeal and application for additional evidence. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments concerning the legality of evidence admission. (Para 9 , 10 , 14) |
| 4. importance of new evidence and its impact. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. reference to relevant case law regarding evidence. (Para 15) |
| 6. final dismissal of the revision petition. (Para 16) |
Judgment
Mr. Vikram Aggarwal, J.
The present revision petition assails the order dated 24.03.2022 (Annexure P-7) passed by the Additional District Judge, Faridabad vide which the application filed by the respondent-defendant under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC for leading additional evidence was allowed.
2. The facts, as emanating from the revision petition, are that the petitioner-plaintiff filed a suit for declaration that the mutation No.2176/2250 dated 06.07.2016 was null and void and was not binding upon the rights of the parties. A decree of permanent injunction restraining the respondent-defendant from alienating the suit property or changing its nature and creating any third party rights etc. was also sought. The case set up by the petitioner-plaintiff was that he was the owner in possession o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
