Back
ARUN MONGA
Haryana Urban Development Authority(Now Haryana Shahri Vikas Pradhikaran – HSVP) – Appellant
Versus
Raj Nakra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of case proceedings. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. the main controversy revolves around interests on delayed payments. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. interpretation of terms related to interest payment in allotment letter. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's reasoning on legality of interest claims. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. court's final order regarding payments and possession. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
Judgment
Mr. Arun Monga, J. (Oral):- Vide this common order and judgment, above-mentioned two revision petitions are being disposed of, since the issues and facts raised therein are common. For brevity, recitals are taken from CR-959-2023.
2. Revision petition arises out of pending execution proceedings before the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Panchkula. Impugned herein is an order dated 15.10.2022 (Annexure P-6), whereby, respondent-decree-holders have been directed to pay Rs.1,28,278/- and petitioner-judgment debtor has been directed to hand over possession of SCO-116, Sector 5, Panchkula, within 7 days.
3. Succinct factual background first, as pleaded in the petition.
3.1. Respondents purchased a commercial plot No.116, Sector 5, Panchkula in an open auction and allot
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
