SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1699

HARKESH MANUJA
Lala Mathura Prasad Trust (Regd. ) – Appellant
Versus
Rajiv Kumar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties :Mr. Sunil Chadha Senior, Advocate, Ms. Devyani Sharma, Mr. Akshay Chadha, Mr. Sumit Sangwan

Judgment

Mr. Harkesh Manuja, J.

This order of mine shall dispose of above-mentioned both civil revisions, wherein similar facts and controversy are involved. For reference, facts are being taken from CR-1991-2020 titled as ‘Lala Mathura Prasad Trust (Regd.) Vs. Rajiv Kumar and others’.

2. By way of present revision petition, challenge has been made to an order dated 28.01.2020 (Annexure P-7) passed by the Rent Controller, Charkhi Dadri in rent petition No.14 dated 04.09.2017 titled as ‘Lala Mathura Prasad Trust (Regd.) Vs. Sh. Rajiv Kumar and others’, whereby an application under Order XV Rule 5 of the CPC, filed at the instance of petitioner-landlord (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Trust’), was dismissed.

3. Briefly stating, claiming itself to be landlord, the petitioner (the Trust) filed an eviction petition against respondents inter alia on the ground of arrears of rent w.e.f. June-2016 till September-2017 @ Rs.5,000/- per month. Upon notice, the respondent-tenants filed their written statements, disputing the rate of rent. Vide order dated 04.10.2017, the Rent Controller passed an order as regards the assessment of provisional rent @ Rs.1,200/- per month w.e.f. June-2016 till Aug

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top