SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1660

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Anupinder Singh Grewal, Kirti Singh, JJ.
Manju Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of UT Chandigarh & Ors. – Respondents
CRWP No. 11926 of 2023
Decided On : 15-12-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Hoshiar Singh Jaswal, Mr. Manish Bansal Addl. Public Prosecutor for U.T. Chandigarh, Mr. Navjit Singh, Mr. Ankush Singla

The court may allow temporary release on personal bond for prisoners unable to arrange surety, emphasizing flexibility in bail conditions.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302 and 201 - Parole/Furlough - The petitioner, convicted under Sections 302 and 201 IPC, seeks temporary release on personal bond after serving over 7 years of her life sentence. The Competent Authority accepted her application with a surety condition, which she cannot fulfill due to financial constraints. The court references a Supreme Court judgment emphasizing the need for timely release of prisoners and the possibility of modifying bail conditions. (Paras 1, 2, 4, 5)

(B) The petitioner has previously availed of parole/furlough and complied with conditions, demonstrating no misuse of the concession. The court directs her release on personal bond, with conditions to report to the local police station. (Paras 4, 6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was convicted in FIR No.43 dated 12.04.2016 and sentenced to life imprisonment. She has undergone 7 years, 2 months, and 21 days of actual sentence and has been unable to arrange the surety amount required for temporary release.

Findings of Court:
The court allows the petitioner's release on parole/furlough upon furnishing personal bonds, directing her to report to the police station weekly.

Issues: The main issue is whether the petitioner can be released on personal bond given her financial situation and the conditions imposed by the Competent Authority.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasizes the importance of ensuring that financial constraints do not impede the timely release of prisoners and that conditions of bail may be modified as necessary.

Result: Petition stands disposed of.

Judgment

Mr. Anupinder Singh Grewal, J.

The petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondents to temporary release her on Parole/Furlough on her personal bond. She is stated to have been convicted under Section 302 and 201 IPC in FIR No.43 dated 12.04.2016 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.12,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for 01 year and 02 months. She is stated to have undergone actual sentence of over 7 years.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner had applied for temporary release which has been accepted by the Competent Authority but a condition of furnishing a surety in the sum of Rs.20,000/- was imposed. The petitioner is a poor lady and has not been able to arrange the surety. He, therefore, submits that she be temporary released on parole/furlough on furnishing personal bond of Rs.20,000/-. He relies upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court passed in ‘SMWP (Criminal) No.4/2021 decided on 31.01.2023’ wherein the directions have been issued for avoiding the delay in releasing of prisoners after getting bail and it has been held that if the bail bonds are not furnished within one month from the date of grant of bail, the concerned Court may suo moto take up the case and consider whether the conditions of bail require modification/relaxation. He further submits that the petitioner is ready to appear before the Police Station Sarangpur, Chandigarh, which is close to her house as per conditions imposed by the Court.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent-U.T. Chandigarh submits that the petitioner is a resident of Chandigarh and it would be difficult for her to arrange surety. In the alternative he has suggested that if this Court is granting the benefit of release on personal bond then she be directed to appear before the Police Station.

4. The applicant is stated to be a poor lady and has not been able to furnish surety bonds. She is convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment. As per the custody certificate dated 06.07.2023, she has undergone actual sentence of 7 years, 2 months and 21 days. She is stated to have been granted the concession of parole/furlough on earlier occasions and had surrendered in jail on its expiry and did not misuse the concession.

5. Competent Authority shall release the petitioner on parole/furlough subject to her furnishing personal bonds in terms of order dated 17.02.2023 and 13.07.2023.

6. The petitioner is directed to appear before the Police Station Sarangpur, Chandigarh, which is stated to be near to her home on every Monday.

7. With the above observations, the petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top