Shivam Singh vs State of Haryana - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 1645

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1645

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Shivam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Akash Krishna, Mr. Jatin Raheja, Mr. Saurabh Mohunta DAG, Haryana, Mr. Vishal Sharma, Mr. Arjun Kundra

Judgment

Mr. Harsimran Singh Sethi, J.

Present petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in respect of FIR No.27 dated 08.05.2021 registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the IPC and Sections 66 & 66-D of the Information Technology Act at Police Station Cyber Crime, Gurugram, Haryana.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits total 09 accused were roped in the present FIR, out of whom, 06 accused are already on bail and anticipatory bail application of one of the accused is already under consideration before this Court and one of the accused is yet to be arrested. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the allegations, which have been alleged against the petitioner are yet to be proved and the investigation is already over and charges have already been framed.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the challan, total 27 witnesses have been cited and not even a single witness has been examined so far and as the trial is likely to take some time before it is concluded, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars during the entire period of trial hence, the pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document