Back
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Joginder Miglani – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Harsimran Singh Sethi J. (Oral) - CRM-37205-2021
Present application has been filed for placing on record Annexures P-14 to P-16.
Keeping in view the averments made in the application, the same is allowed and Annexures P-14 to P-16 are permitted to be taken on record.
CRM-43019-2021
Present application has been filed for placing on record Annexures P-17 to P-23.
Keeping in view the averments made in the application, the same is allowed and Annexures P-17 to P-23 are permitted to be taken on record.
CRM-44330-2021
Learned senior counsel for the applicant-complainant prays that he be allowed to withdraw the present application with liberty to avail appropriate remedy if any needed at the later stage.
Ordered accordingly.
CRM-M-45552-2021
2. Present petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in respect of FIR No.83 dated 28.03.2017 registered under Sections 420, 466, 467, 468, 469, 471, 472 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police Station Daba, District Police Commissionerate Ludhiana.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the petitioner had got FIR registered against the present complainant being FIR No.236 date
Grant of regular bail based on completion of investigation, interim relief granted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, and petitioner's undertaking not to influence the trial or abscond.
Delay in trial attributable to accused does not entitle petitioner to regular bail based on prolonged custody.
The existence of animosity between the parties, previous grant of bail in similar cases, and the likelihood of a delayed trial were key factors in granting regular bail to the petitioner.
The court's decision was influenced by the completion of the investigation, the lack of risk posed by releasing the petitioner on bail, and the lengthy trial period.
Abuse of the process of the Court by filing subsequent/successive anticipatory bail applications without justification.
FIR alleging forgery and cheating discloses cognizable offences precluding quashing under CrPC Section 482 despite compromise or mala fides claims; bail cancellation requires proven misuse or superve....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
