SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1713

SURESHWAR THAKUR, SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Khazan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Hisar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Deepak Singh Saini, Mr. P.P. Chahar DAG, Haryana

Judgment

Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, J.

The petitioners in the present writ petition have assailed the order dated 09.11.1994 (Annexure P-6) passed by the Commissioner, Hisar Division, Hisar, whereby the revision petition under Section 13-A of the Haryana Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (hereinafter to be referred to as “the Act of 1961”) against the order dated 28.07.1992 of the Collector, Jind, filed by one Baru, has been decided against the petitioners.

2. The brief facts of the present case are that the petitioners herein filed a suit for declaration under Section 13-A of the Act of 1961 and the Assistant Collector 1st Grade, Jind, decreed the suit on 29.08.1986. Aggrieved against the same, respondent No.4 (Baru son of Lehri) filed an appeal before the Collector, Jind, who remanded the said appeal to the Assistant Collector 1st Grade, Jind, vide order dated 04.08.1987 to give a well reasoned finding issuewise. Assistant Collector 1st Grade, Jind, decided the case on 26.10.1987 in favour of the petitioners. Respondent No.4 (Baru) went to the Court of Collector concerned, who vide the order dated 25.04.1988 set aside the order of the Assistant Collector 1st Grade and directed t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top