Judgment

Mrs. Sukhvinder Kaur, J.

By way of present revision petition, the petitioner has challenged order dated 15.11.2023 (Annexure P-5) passed by learned trial Court, vide which application filed by the petitioner/plaintiff for appointment of Local Commissioner, has been rejected.

2. The brief facts relevant for the adjudication of the present revision petition are that the petitioner/plaintiff had filed a suit for declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction against the respondents/defendants claiming declaration to the effect that the passage/rasta 22 feet in the suit property is common for use of all the residents and the defendants have no right to interfere or block the said passage/rasta by any means and also for permanent injunction to the effect that the defendants/respondents are restrained from interfering in the passage/rasta used by the plaintiff/petitioner by blocking the same or from reducing the width of the said passage/rasta. After issuing of notice to the respondents/defendants by the trial Court, they appeared and filed the written statement with the averments that they are in exclusive possession of immovable property in dispute and denied that