ANOOP CHITKARA
Savita – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
Judgment
Mr. Anoop Chitkara, J. :-
FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections
205 14.11.2023 Bond Kalan, District 7, 7A, 13(1) and 13(2) of the
Charkhi Dadri, Haryana. Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Sections 384, 389/34 IPC (added later on).
1. Ms. Savita, who was an Assistant Sub Inspector of Police, and Rajbir Singh, who was a Sub Inspector of Police and posted as SHO, apprehending arrest in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail, on the allegations of misusing their official positions and conspiring with the victim’s Advocate, and probably also with the alleged victim of rape, and facilitated a compromise between the victim and the accused for Rs. Twelve lacs, out of which the Police officials and the Advocate received Rs. Eight lacs, and after the accused agreed to pay the money, the victim refused to undergo any medical examination and finally in her statement recorded under 164 CrPC by the Judicial Magistrate, stated on oath that nothing was done to her; however when the higher police officials heard about the misdeeds, they inquired into the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.