SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 237

ANOOP CHITKARA
Savita – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties :Mr. Rakesh Nehra Senior, Advocate, Mr. Vikalp Hooda, Ms. Shivani Jaglan, Mr. R.K. Singla DAG, Haryana

Judgment

Mr. Anoop Chitkara, J. :-

FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections

205 14.11.2023 Bond Kalan, District 7, 7A, 13(1) and 13(2) of the

Charkhi Dadri, Haryana. Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Sections 384, 389/34 IPC (added later on).

1. Ms. Savita, who was an Assistant Sub Inspector of Police, and Rajbir Singh, who was a Sub Inspector of Police and posted as SHO, apprehending arrest in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail, on the allegations of misusing their official positions and conspiring with the victim’s Advocate, and probably also with the alleged victim of rape, and facilitated a compromise between the victim and the accused for Rs. Twelve lacs, out of which the Police officials and the Advocate received Rs. Eight lacs, and after the accused agreed to pay the money, the victim refused to undergo any medical examination and finally in her statement recorded under 164 CrPC by the Judicial Magistrate, stated on oath that nothing was done to her; however when the higher police officials heard about the misdeeds, they inquired into the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top