Judgment

Mrs. Meenakshi I. Mehta, J.

Feeling aggrieved by the order passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana (for short ‘the trial Court’) on 11.01.2024 in Civil Suit No.45762 of 2013 titled as ‘Sharanjit Kaur versus Smt. Parveen Mahal and others’ (here-in-after to be referred as ‘the subsequent Suit’), whereby the application (Annexure P-6) moved by the petitioner-plaintiff (here-in-after to be referred as ‘the plaintiff’) under Section 10 CPC with the prayer to stay the proceedings in the above-said Civil Suit, has been dismissed, she (plaintiff) has chosen to prefer the instant revision-petition to lay challenge to the same.

2. I have heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff as well as learned Senior counsel for respondent No.1-Caveator in the present revision-petition, at the preliminary stage and have also perused the file carefully.

3. Learned Senior counsel for the plaintiff has contended that besides the afore-referred subsequent Suit, two more Civil Suits (here-in-after to be referred as ‘the previous Suits’) had been filed earlier regarding the same property, which is the subject-matter of the subsequent Suit and those previous Suits were adj