SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 601

SUREPALLI NANDA
K. Parijathamma – Appellant
Versus
B. Suresh Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri M. Damodar Reddy
For the Respondent: Sri V. Hanumanth Rao

ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent.

2. This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the propriety and legality of the order dated 15.12.2022 in I.A.No.57 of 2021 in O.S.No.2 of 2019 passed by the Court of Principal District Judge, Wanaparthy.

3. For the sake of convenience the parties are referred to as they are arrayed in the suit before the lower Court.

4. The defendant filed I.A.No.57 of 2021, under Section 10 C.P.C., to grant stay of the suit proceedings in O.S.No.2 of 2019 till the disposal of the previously instituted suit that is O.S.No.165 of 2018 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge at Kollapur.

5. The case of the petitioner/defendant is that the respondent/plaintiff filed the present suit against her for Specific Performance of the Suit Agreement of Sale. Kannareddy Vijender Reddy, the brother of the petitioner had already filed O.S.No.165 of 2018, for partition of family properties including the suit schedule property and the suit is now pending. In O.S.No.165 of 2018 the issue that has to be decided is whether the property involved in the present suit is joint family property or not and so till the disposal of the pre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top