SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 140

SURESHWAR THAKUR, SUKHVINDER KAUR
Lekhraj @ Lalmani @ Lalu – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Gaurav Singla, Mr. Ankur Mittal AAG, Haryana, Mr. Saurabh Mago DAG, Haryana

Judgment

Mr. Sureshwar Thakur, J.

The present petitioner is undergoing detention in District Jail, Faridabad, in pursuance to a verdict of conviction and consequent thereto substantive sentence of imprisonment becoming imposed upon him, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Palwal, in case arising from FIR No. 669 of 2017 dated 27.08.2017 registered at Police Station Sadar Palwal, District Palwal, embodying thereins offences under Sections 148/149/302 IPC and Section 25/54/59 of the Arms Act, 1959.

2. During the period of his undergoing the substantive sentence of imprisonment, he preferred an application before the Competent Authority concerned, claiming relief qua his becoming released on parole. The ground as set forth in the said application, is that, he is required to be making the repairs of his house and that he is required to be also meeting his family members. Therefore, he claimed that for the afore purpose, he be released on parole for a period lasting for about 70 days. On the said application, a declining order (Annexure P-5) became rendered.

3. The reason as became set forth in the declining order (Annexure P-5) was banked, upon, the provisions occurring in Section 6(

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top