SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Kaushal – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kamal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sudeepti Sharma, J.
The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 22.04.2006 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Faridabad, whereby the claim of appellant has been rejected.
2. The brief facts of the case as mentioned in the claim petition are that on 20.03.2004 at about 1.15 a.m, Angesh Kumar was returning from his Company and going to his residence in village Ajronda on cycle. When he reached Neelam fly-over, TATA Sumo HR-38/HT-9590 came from behind i.e from the side of Neelam Chowk and hit Angesh Kumar from behind. Resultantly he suffered serious injuries. He was taken to B.K.Hospital, Faridabad from where he was referred to Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi, but due to serious condition, he was got admitted in Fortis Excorts Hospital, Faridabad. However, he succumbed to his injuries there in the evening. It was averred that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the aforesaid TATA Sumo by Raj Kamal (respondent No.1) who was driving it at the time of accident. Angesh Kumar was plying his cycle on correct left side and it was hit from behind and, so, principle of res ipsa loquitur is attracted. F.I.R No. 99 dated 20.03.2004 was regis
Dara Singh @ Dhara Banjara Vs. Shyam Singh Varma 2019 ACJ 3176
Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation
Magma General Insurance Company Limited Vs. Nanu Ram alias Chuhru Ram & Ors. (2018) 18 SCC 130
National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. (2017) 16 SCC 680
R. Valli and Others VS. Tamil Nandu State Transport Corporation (2022) 5 SCC 107
Sarla Verma & Ors. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr. (2009) 6 SCC 121
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.