JUDGMENT :

Manjari Nehru Kaul, J.

CRM No.17628 of 2024

In view of the averments made in the application and in the interest of justice, the same is allowed as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The rejoinder of the petitioner to the reply filed on behalf of the respondent/CBI along with supporting documents (Annexures P-15 to P-18A-C) are taken on record.

CRM-M No.18316 of 2024

1. The petitioner, in the instant petition, filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., is seeking quashing of order dated 06.04.2024 (Annexure P-2) passed by the Court of learned Special Judge, CBI, Chandigarh vide which her application under Section 207 of the Cr.P.C. was dismissed.

2. It has been contended by the learned senior counsel that documents listed at Sr.No.6(a) and 6(b) of seizure memo (D/5) annexed at Annexure P-5 be supplied to the petitioner inter alia on the following grounds:

(i) That the CBI has relied on seizure memo (annexed as Annexure P-5) in both its reports filed under Section 173(2) and 173(8) of the Cr.P.C. Despite this, the CBI is now claiming that certain documents which form part of the seizure memo, are ‘unrelied upon’ documents since they are not a part of the challan. Rather, a perusa