IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, N.S. SHEKHAWAT, JJ.
Ranbir Singh & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
State of Haryana - Respondent
CRA-D. No. 617-DB of 2003
Decided On : 28-05-2024
Criminal - Murder - IPC Sections 302/34, Arms Act Section 25 - The court discussed the evidentiary standards for circumstantial evidence, emphasizing the need for a complete chain of evidence that excludes all reasonable hypotheses of innocence, ultimately leading to the acquittal of the accused.
Fact of the Case:
The appellants were convicted for the murder of a monk, with evidence primarily based on circumstantial evidence, including a confession and recovery of a knife. The prosecution claimed the appellants had a motive due to prior harassment.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the prosecution's evidence unreliable, particularly the circumstantial evidence, which failed to establish a conclusive link between the accused and the crime, leading to a lack of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Issues: Whether the circumstantial evidence presented by the prosecution was sufficient to establish the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.
Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated that in cases based on circumstantial evidence, the circumstances must be consistent only with the guilt of the accused and must exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.
Result: The appeal is allowed, and the appellant is acquitted of all charges.
JUDGMENT :
Mr. N.S. Shekhawat, J.
The appellants have preferred the present appeal against the impugned judgment of conviction dated 14.07.2003 and order of sentence dated 16.07.2023 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc), Fast Track Court, Sonepat, whereby the appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under:-
| Convict(s) Name | Offence | Sentence |
| Ranbir Singh and Joginder Singh @ Chela | Section 302/34 IPC | To undergo imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.5000/- each and in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months each. |
| Joginder @ Chela | Section 25 of the Arms Act | To undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year with fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one month. |
2. As per the case of the prosecution, the FIR Ex.PA/1 was registered in the present case on the basis of the statement Ex.PA, which was made by Ved Prakash son of Pokar Dass and the same reads as under:-
3. After recording the statement of the complainant Ex.PA, ASI Ram Avtar went to the place of occurrence situated at village Kheri Taga and found the dead body of an unknown monk (sanyasi). The initial investigation was conducted at the spot and the dead body was shifted to Civil Hospital, Sonepat for examination. On 03.11.2001, post-mortem examination was conducted by Dr. Arun Garg and Dr. Varsha. Since nobody claimed the dead body for two days, the dead body was handed over to Municipal Committee, Ganaur for cremation and the dead body was cremated. On 09.11.2001, the ration card Ex.P1 and the receipt Ex. P2, which were found in a bag lying in the room where the occurrence had taken place, were handed over by Ved Prakash to ASI Pritam Singh, which were taken into possession by the police. As per the ration card, it was issued to Ram Sanjivan and his family members and the receipt was issued by Cooperative Store, situated at Rai Bareilly. UGC Nafe Singh was sent to village Paithana, District Rai Bareilly to make inquiries there, so that the identity of deceased might be established. UGC Nafe Singh met Virender Tiwari son of Ram Sanjivan Tiwari at village Paithana and showed him the ration card Ex.P1 and receipt Ex P2. Virender Tiwari came to village Kheri Taga on 13.11.2001 and after seeing the photographs Ex.P3 to Ex.P5, he identified the deceased as his father i.e. Ram Sanjivan Tiwari. The statement of Virender Tiwari was also recorded by the police, who stated that his father Ram Sanjivan Dass Tiwari was living at village Bahalgarh in the year 2001. On the request of residents of village Kheri Taga, Ram Sanjivan Dass started performing the duties of a priest (Pujari) at village Medi Guga Peer and started residing there. Ram Sanivan Dass once told him that he was being harassed by Ranbir Singh and Joginder Singh, res
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra
Hanumant v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Tufail (Alias) Simmi v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Circumstantial evidence – Principle applicable to circumstantial evidence requires that facts must be consistent with hypothesis of guilt of accused.
Direct eyewitness testimony sufficient for murder conviction under Section 302 IPC despite no motive; absence of motive not fatal if evidence reliable and conclusive.
Circumstantial evidence – Where a case rests squarely on circumstantial evidence, inference of guilt can be justified only when all incriminating facts and circumstances are found to be incompatible ....
In criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence, a complete and unbroken chain of evidence is necessary to satisfy the standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt for a conviction.
In a criminal trial based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish a complete and unbroken chain of circumstances that excludes every reasonable hypothesis of innocence. Suspicion c....
Another important aspect to be considered in a case resting on circumstantial evidence is the lapse of time between the point when the accused and deceased were seen together and when the deceased is....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.