SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 338

RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Parshotam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Deepak Verma, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Arun William, Mr. Amit Kumar Saini, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.

1. Prayer in the present petition is for quashing the order dated 27.11.2015 (Annexure P-4) passed by learned Financial Commissioner, Appeals-I, Punjab, Chandigarh whereby respondent No.5 has been wrongly appointed as Lambardar of the village Surapur, Tehsil Nawashahar, District Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar.

2. Adumbrated facts of the case are that on account of death of Sewa Singh, earlier Lambardar of the village Surapur, Tehsil Nawashahar, District Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar on 07.05.2009, post of Lambardar fell vacant and thus, process for the appointment of new Lambardar was initiated. Proclamation was got done in the village for inviting applications from the interested candidates. In pursuance to the same, five applications were received. Character verifications of all the candidate were conducted. However, only Kulbir Singh, Parshotam Singh and Harmail Singh appeared alongwith their counsel before the Collector. On the comparison of inter-se merits of these candidates, their antecedents were found as under:-

 Name

Age

Education

Land

Recommendation

Kulbir Singh

38 years

10+2

5 kanals

SDM, Nawashahar

Parshotam Singh

65 years

10th

8

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top