SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 648

RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Manjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Financial Commissioner (Appeals) – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr.Rai Singh Chauhan, Advocate and Mr. Balram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.

1. Prayer in the present petition is for quashing the order dated 29.05.2023 (Annexure P-11) passed by respondent No.1 i.e. the Financial Commissioner and order dated 02.11.2022 (Annexure P-9) passed by respondent No.2 i.e. Commissioner, Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar.

2. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that after the death of Gurdeep Singh Sandhu, Lambardar of the village Mohkamgarh/17, Tehsil Dasuya, District Hoshiarpur, post of Lambardar fell vacant and hence, proceedings for appointment of new Lambardar were initiated. Mushtari Munadi was conducted in the village regarding appointment of general Lambardar. He has submitted that in pursuance to the same, six applications were received and their character verification was got done from the SHO Police Station Tanda. He has submitted that personal details of the candidates are as under:-

Sr. No.

Name of the candidate

Age

Qualification

Land

Caste

Occupation

Ex service man

Remarks

1.

Jagvir Singh Kalkat son of Jagir Singh

32

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top