SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 567

ALKA SARIN
Sakattar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Manjit Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. B.S. Jaswal, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. A.S. Salar, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

(Alka Sarin, J.) :

The present civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the impugned order dated 15.02.2017 and order dated 11.03.2019 whereby the application filed by defendant No.1-petitioner under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been dismissed.

2. The brief facts relevant to the present lis are that in 2002 the plaintiff-respondent No.1 herein filed a suit for possession by way of specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 11.11.1999 against the defendants i.e. petitioner and respondent No.2 – Shamsher Singh (since deceased) in respect of Khasra No.150 min measuring 125 sq. yds. situated in Village Kale Ghanupur Tehsil and District Amritsar on payment of Rs.30,000/- as also for permanent injunction. The suit was decreed ex-parte on 10.01.2007. In 2013 when the plaintiff-respondent No.1 had taken out execution proceedings, the defendant No.1-petitioner filed an application uunder Order 9 Rule 13 CPC for setting aside the ex-parte judgment and decree dated 10.01.2007. The case set-up by the defendant No.1-petitioner was that he never served and infact a wrong address was given in th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top