SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 729

ALKA SARIN
Karnail Singh (Since Deceased) through LR – Appellant
Versus
Gurnam Kaur (Since Deceased) through LR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Nitin Verma, Advocate; For the Petitioner

JUDGMENT

Alka Sarin, J.

The present civil revision petition has been preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the impugned order dated 09.01.2019 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Trial Court and the impugned order dated 01.11.2023 (Annexure P-5) passed by the First Appellate Court whereby the application filed by the defendant-petitioner under Order 9, Rule 3 read with Order 9, Rule 13 CPC has been dismissed.

2. The brief facts relevant to the present lis are that the plaintiff-respondent Nos.1 and 2 filed a suit for possession by way of partition of gair mumkin abadi land fully detailed in the head note of the plaint. Notice of the suit as well as stay application was issued to the defendants including the defendant-petitioner. On 13.12.2011 the defendant-petitioner and some other defendants appeared in Court and their presence was recorded with their signatures/thumb impressions on the zimni order sheet. Thereafter the defendant-petitioner was proceeded against ex-parte and subsequently an application for setting aside the ex-parte proceedings against the defendant-petitioner was allowed on 09.08.2012. On 18.10.2014 the defendant-petitioner failed to appear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top