SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1871

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SANJAY VASHISTH, J.
Kali - Appellant
Versus
State of U.T. Chandigarh – Respondent
CRA-S No.2384-SB of 2003 (O&M)
Decided On : 20-01-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Abhaysher Singh, (Legal Aid Counsel).
For the Respondent: Ms. Roopse Sharma, for Mr. Anil Kumar Lamdharia, Addl. P.P. UT, Chandigarh.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 21 and Section 50 - Appeal against conviction - Appellant convicted for possession of 12 grams of smack and sentenced to RI for 1 year and 6 months and fine of Rs. 10,000/- - Prosecution failed to comply with mandatory provisions of law regarding the notice and sampling procedures, leading to appellate court's finding of insufficient evidence to uphold conviction. (Paras 10, 12, 14)

(B) Compliance with legal provisions - The court emphasized that proper compliance with Sections 50 and 52-A of the NDPS Act is essential, including the necessity of conducting searches in presence of a Magistrate and proper sample handling. (Paras 10, 11)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was charged under the NDPS Act for possession of smack following a police raid based on confidential information. Recovery from the appellant was contested on grounds of procedural non-compliance during the search and sampling.

Findings of Court:
The court set aside the previous conviction and orders due to non-compliance with the NDPS Act.

Issues: Was there compliance with the procedural requirements of the NDPS Act during the search and seizure of narcotics?

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the failure to properly inform the appellant of her rights under Section 50 compromised the validity of the evidence against her, reaffirming the need for strict adherence to legal protocols.

Result: Appeal allowed. Conviction set aside.

Table of Content
1. factual background of drug conviction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments on non-compliance of ndps provisions. (Para 6 , 7)
3. state's evidence and prosecution arguments. (Para 8 , 9)
4. court's evaluation of evidence compliance. (Para 10 , 11)
5. failure to comply with mandatory ndps provisions. (Para 12)
6. judgment set aside and appellant acquitted. (Para 14)

JUDGMENT :

(Sanjay Vashisth, J.)

Present appeal is filed by appellants-Smt.Kali, against the judgment of her conviction dated 06.11.2003 and order of sentence dated 07.11.2003, passed by Ld. Judge, Special Court, Chandigarh, in NDPS Case No.74 of 07.08.2003/26.09.2000, arising from FIR No.285 dated 23.07.2000, under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity 'NDPS Act'), registered at Police Station Sector 39, Chandigarh.

2. For the recovery of 12 grams smack, appellant, was sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 01 year and six months, and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-, and in default of payment of fine to further undergo RI for 06 months.

FACTS LEADING TO REGISTRATION OF THE FIR:

3. On 23.07.2000 at about 3.00 P.M., police party headed by SI Kuldeep Singh including SI Jai Singh and other police officials was present at police booth Dadu Majra Colony, Chandigarh. After some time, a secret information was received that Gujri and Kali residents of House No.2676, Dadu Majra Colony, UT, Chandigarh deals in smack in their house and in case their house was raided, at this time, smack can be recovered.

After sending information to the police station, one public person Jaspal Singh, who was joined by the police team reached the house No.2676, Dadu Majra Colony, Chandigarh. By sending a wireless message, Shri B.D.Bector, DSP was also called on spot at about 4.30 P.M. and he joined the raiding party. On knocking the doors of the house, Gujri opened the same and purpose of visiting of police party in their house was disclosed by DSP B.D.Bector by projecting his identity.

First of all, search of Gujri was conducted and in connection with the recovery from her possession, a separate case was registered against her under NDPS Act. Thereafter, DSP B.D.Bector served a notice under Section 50 of the NDPS Act upon appellant-Kali, who opted to be searched in the presence of DSP B.D.Bector.

Accordingly, as per instructions of DSP B.D.Bector, a lady constable-Devinder Kaur conducted the search of the accused and on search, 12 grams smack wrapped in a glazed paper was recovered. Two grams smack was separated for sampling. Both the sample parcels and parcel containing remaining case property were sealed with the seal 'KS' and were taken in police possession. Sample of the seal was also obtained on a piece of cloth. The seal after its use was handed over to Jaspal Singh. Ruqa was sent to the police station on the basis of which FIR was lodged.

By calling ASI Gajjan Singh on spot from the police station, further investigation was conducted by him.

4. After recording of the statement of witnesses and the completion of the investigation, final report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. was submitted. Accordingly, appellant was charge-sheeted for the offence under Section 21 of the NDPS Act to which she pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.

5. Prosecution examined total 12 witnesses and ultimately, appellant was convicted and sentenced as has already been detailed in the initial part of this judgment.

6. Mr.Abhaysher Singh, Advocate, who was appointed as Legal Aid Counsel by this Court vide order dated 15.12.2022 opened his argument with the point that in view of non-compliance of the provisions of NDPS Act, conviction of the appellant cannot sustain.

Notice is available on record as Ex.PC. Translated version of which is reproduced here below:

“Notice Ex.PC

My name is Bhagwan Dass Bector. In Chandigarh Police, Chandigarh Administration, I am G. O. (DSP) (Gazzetted Officer). I have information that in your possession namely Kali w/o Suka Singh R/o House

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top