SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1870

VIKAS BAHL
Ravi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner-cum-Appellate Tribunal, Jhajjar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ravinder Rana.

Table of Content
1. legal context of the challenge and property ownership (Para 1 , 4)
2. arguments regarding property ownership and residency (Para 2 , 6 , 7)
3. court's observations on eviction orders and rights (Para 3 , 5)
4. analysis of maintenance rights under the senior citizens act (Para 8 , 9)
5. final dismissal of the petition (Para 10)

JUDGMENT :

(Vikas Bahl, J.)

Challenge in the present writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is to the order dated 14.09.2022 passed by the Maintenance Tribunal-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Bhadurgarh, District Jhajjar (Annexure P3), whereby, the application under Section 22 of the Maintenance & Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as `Act of 2007') moved by respondents No.3 and 4 has been allowed. Challenge is also to the order dated 09.05.2023 passed by the Appellate Tribunal-cum-Deputy Commissioner, Jhajjar, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the impugned orders are illegal and deserves to be set aside on two grounds, firstly that the property in question i.e., House No.125, Gali No.2, Sha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top