Back
ALKA SARIN
Ram Chander – Appellant
Versus
Ramdhari – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Alka Sarin, J.
The present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for modification of the order dated 24.02.2020 whereby the application for leading additional evidence has partly been allowed.
2. The brief facts relevant to the present lis are that the plaintiff-petitioner filed a suit for declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction for declaring GPA No.3639/4 dated 24.09.2001, sale deed bearing No.1398 dated 28.05.2004, mutation bearing No.6647 dated 08.09.2007 and all the subsequent entries in the revenue record as illegal, null and void and not binding upon the rights of the plaintiff-petitioner. During course of proceedings, an application for permission to produce additional evidence was filed by the plaintiff-petitioner and the following documents were sought to be produced:
The admission of additional evidence in appellate proceedings requires a clear necessity to support the main issues at hand, as per Order 41 Rule 27 CPC.
Certified copies of registered deeds are admissible in evidence under the Indian Evidence Act and should be tentatively marked as exhibits without requiring the registering authority's presence for p....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
