SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1930

ARUN MONGA
Ramesh – Appellant
Versus
Maha Dev – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.Babbar Bhan, for Mr.Naveen S.Bhardwaj

JUDGMENT :

Arun Monga, J.

CM-2229-C-2019

For the reasons stated in application, same is allowed and delay of 260 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned, subject to all just exceptions.

MAIN CASE

For convenience, parties herein are addressed as per the recitals before learned trial Court.

2. Instant appeal is against judgment and decree dated 29.08.2014 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Loharu, vide which suit filed by plaintiff/respondent No.1 herein, for declaration and permanent injunction was decreed with costs, as affirmed by learned Additional District Judge, Bhiwani, vide judgment and decree dated 27.10.2017.

3. Briefly stated, facts as noticed by Courts below are that plaintiff (respondent No.1 herein) filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction claiming himself as owner in possession of 1/3rd share of total land measuring 24 Kanals 11 Marlas on the basis of judgment and decree dated 23.10.1982 passed by then Sub Judge First Class, Bhiwani. Defendants No.1 to 3 were having 1/12th share in equal shares whereas defendants No.4 to 6 were having 1/4th share in equal shares and defendant No.7 was owner in possession of remaining 1/3rd share over the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top