Mangal Dass Bhatti vs Inder Singh Kohli

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(P&H) 797

ALKA SARIN
Mangal Dass Bhatti – Appellant
Versus
Inder Singh Kohli – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Amit Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. S.P. Arora, Advocate and Mr. Varun Parkash, Advocate; For the Appellant
Mr. Baldev Raj Mahajan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Mr. Daanish Mahajan, Advocates and Ms. Nikita Goyal, Advocate; For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Alka Sarin, J.

The present appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff-appellant challenging the judgment and decree dated 23.09.2011 passed by the First Appellate Court whereby the appeal of the defendant-respondent was accepted and the suit of the plaintiff-appellant was decreed for recovery of Rs. 2 lacs along with future interest @ 6% from date of the decree till realization.

2. The brief facts relevant to the present lis are that a suit for specific performance was filed by the plaintiff-appellant qua agreement to sell dated 21.12.2001 alleged to have been executed by the defendant-respondent in favour of the plaintiff-appellant in respect of land measuring 75 kanals 18 marlas bearing Khewat No.250, Khatuni No.300, Khasra Nos.32//6(6-12), 32//13/3(3-7), 32//7/1(1-13), 32//7/2(3-15), 32//14(8-0), 32//15/1(1-2), 32//17(8-12), 32//18(8-0), 32//23(7-11), 32//24(7-11), 32//25/3(3-10), 32//27(0-5), Khatuni No.345, Khasra Nos.32//15/2(6-2), 32//16(7-4) and 32//25/1(0-8), Khewat No.573, Khatuani No.715, Khasra No.32//25/2(3-0) situated in Village Naharpur, HB No. 150, Tehsil Jagadhari, District Yamuna Nagar. It was averred in the plaint that the agreement to sell dated 21.1