SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2634

AMAN CHAUDHARY
Satnam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Rohan Mittal, Advocate; For the Appellant
Mr. H.S. Sullar, Sr. DAG Punjab

Table of Content
1. appellant's conviction details and background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court's affirmation of conviction. (Para 4 , 8 , 9)
3. arguments for sentence reduction. (Para 6 , 7)
4. precedents on sentence reduction. (Para 10 , 11)
5. final decision on sentence modification. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT

Aman Chaudhary, J.

Challenge in the present appeal is to the judgment and order dated 16.11.2015 passed by Special Court, Tarn Taran, vide which the appellant was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs.20,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'NDPS Act').

2. Succinctly, the facts of the prosecution case are that on 29.03.2012, Assistant Sub Inspector Avtar Singh along with police party were patrolling and when they reached Jandiala road, near the pound of village Mallian, they saw one Hindu gentleman coming on foot from the opposite side of village Mallian, who on seeing the police party threw one polythene envelope of black colour towards the side of pound and turned back. On the asking of the Investigating Officer the accused told him that it contained in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top