SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2443

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AMARJOT BHATTI, J.
Surjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Chint Kaur (Since Deceased Through Legal Heirs Surjit Kaur and Bhajan Kaur) & Anr. – Respondents
RSA-3259 of 2016 (O&M)
Decided On : 02-12-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate; For the Appellant
Mr. Sherry K. Singla, Advocate for Respondent/caveator Bhajan Kaur.

The court upheld the validity of gift deeds executed by a competent donor, emphasizing the necessity of substantial evidence to prove claims of fraud or undue influence.

Headnote:(A) Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Joint Hindu Family Property - The appellant/plaintiff claimed co-ownership of ancestral land, alleging fraud in gift deeds executed by defendant No. 1 in favor of defendant No. 2. The courts upheld earlier judgments dismissing her claims. (Paras 2-14)

(B) Mental Competence - The court found no convincing evidence that the donor was mentally unfit to execute the gift deeds, emphasizing the validity of registered documents. (Paras 12-14)

(C) Burden of Proof - The plaintiff failed to prove her claims of fraud and undue influence over the donor. (Paras 12-14)

Facts of the case:
The plaintiff asserted joint ownership of land inherited from their father and challenged gift deeds executed by her mother in favor of her sister, claiming they were fraudulent.

Findings of Court:
The courts found the gift deeds valid and the plaintiff's claims unproven.

Issues: The main issues revolved around the legality of the gift deeds and the mental fitness of the donor at the time of execution.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the execution of the gift deeds was valid, and the plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to challenge them.

Result: The Regular Second Appeal was dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Amarjot Bhatti, J.

The appellant/plaintiff - Surjit Kaur has filed Regular Second Appeal against impugned judgment and decree dated 18.09.2015 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Rupnagar vide which the appeal preferred by Surjit Kaur plaintiff was dismissed and the judgment and decree dated 28.07.2014 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Anandpur Sahib dismissing the suit filed by the plaintiff was upheld.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff Surjit Kaur had filed suit for declaration that she is joint owner/co-sharer in joint possession of the land measuring 104 kanals - 4 marlas as mentioned in head note of the plaint situated at village Bela Ramgarh, Tehsil Anandpur Sahib, District Ropar as per jamabandi for the year 2002-03 and five number of gift deeds all dated 30.05.2005 alleged to be executed by defendant No. 1 in favour of defendant No. 2 and the mutation numbers 2756, 2757, 2758, 2760 and 2761 and the revenue record showing defendant No. 2 as owner in possession on the basis of alleged five gift deeds are wrong, illegal, null, incompetent, forged, fabricated, result of fraud, without consideration and are not binding upon the rights of the plaintiff and are liable to be set aside alongwith suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from dispossessing the plaintiff forcibly and illegally, changing the nature of suit land, raising any type of construction or structure, selling, alienating the suit land, cutting and removing the trees or creating any type of charge on the suit land in any manner and in the alternative filed suit for possession.

3. The plaintiff submitted that she is the joint owner, co-sharer in joint possession of suit land recorded in the name of Chint Kaur, as detailed in the head note of the plaint. The plaintiff and defendant No. 2 are the members of Joint Hindu Family and they were co-parcenars with their father Kesra Singh. The suit land was ancestral land in the hands of Kesra Singh. The pedigree table showing the relationship of plaintiff and defendants with Kesra Singh is as under :-

Wazira

- Deva Singh

- Kesra Singh

Smt. Chint Kaur

(defendant No. 1)

Smt. Bhajan Kaur

(defendant No. 2)

Smt. Surjit Kaur

(plaintiff)

It was further submitted that Deva Singh expired in the year about 1922 and after the death of Deva Singh, the suit property was inherited by his sons Mehar Singh and Kesra Singh. That Kesra Singh executed a sale deed dated 27.08.1985 in favour of his wife Chint Kaur, defendant No. 1 regarding the land as mentioned in para No. 5 of the plaint. It was further submitted that Kesra Singh had no right to sell the land measuring 34 kanals - 3 marlas, in favour of defendant No. 1, being their Joint Hindu Family coparcenary and ancestral property. The alleged sale deed is wrong, illegal, null and void. That Kesra Singh died intestate in the year 1989, leaving behind the plaintiff and defendant No. 2 (daughters) as the sole legal heirs under the Hindu Mitakshra Law and after his death the entire property was inherited by plaintiff and defendant No. 2 in equal shares. The plaintiff and defendant No. 2 are also entitled to the share of Chint Kaur in equal shares being the property held by Chint Kaur on the basis of alleged sale deed dated 27.08.1985 was ancestral land. It was further submitted that the five number of gift deeds all dated 30.05.2005 alleged to have been executed by Smt. Chint Kaur in favour of defendant No. 2 are wrong, illegal, null, void, forged, fabricated and undue influence practised by defendant No. 2 upon defendant No. 1. It was further submitted that Chint Kaur was old lady, aged about 90 years and defendant No. 2 in collusion with the attesting witnesses, scribe and the registration agency procured the alleged gift deeds by practising fraud upon defendant No. 2. The plaintiff was looking after and maintaining her parents after her marriage in the year 1972 by staying with her parents in village Bela Ramgarh.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top