Back
ARCHANA PURI
Amarjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Amarjit Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Archana Puri, J.
Challenge in the present appeal is to the Award dated 20.07.1993 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, thereby, granting compensation, on account of death of Kuldip Singh, in a motor vehicular accident.
2. On appraisal of the evidence adduced, learned Tribunal vide impugned Award, had granted compensation to the extent of Rs.4,20,000/-, qua death of Kuldip Singh, in the accident, which took place on 16.10.1991, due to rash and negligent driving of respondent No.1-Amarjit Singh, while driving fiat car bearing registration No.PAV-410.
3. Feeling aggrieved by the extent of compensation, so granted, the appellants-claimants have filed the present appeal, thereby, seeking enhancement of the compensation.
4. So far as, the fact of accident and manner of its taking place as well as the liability of the driver, owner and insurer of the offending vehicle, to be joint and several, are concerned, it is pertinent to mention that no appeal has been filed by these persons, to dispute the liability fastened upon them.
5. The present appeal has been filed by the appellants-claimants, only with regard to the interest, having not been granted, from the date of fi
The court established that compensation awarded under the Motor Vehicles Act must be just and reasonable, irrespective of the amount claimed, emphasizing the tribunal's duty to assess fair compensati....
The court emphasized that compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act must be just and may exceed the claimed amount, ensuring fair assessment based on evidence.
The court established that compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act must be just and may exceed the amount claimed, considering the deceased's income and family dependency.
The court affirmed the principle of just compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, emphasizing that potential earnings should be considered when calculating dependency loss.
Compensation in motor accident claims must reflect loss accurately and may exceed claimed amounts if justified, adhering to established guidelines for multiplier and dependency calculations.
The court reaffirmed the principle of just compensation, allowing enhancement beyond the claimed amount, emphasizing the duty to assess fair compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.
The court ruled that compensation for road accident victims must be just and may exceed the claimed amount, emphasizing the application of preponderance of evidence over strict liability standards.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
