SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 3120

NIDHI GUPTA
Babli Devi – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Dutt – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Chander Shekhar Singhal, Advocate; For the Appellant

Table of Content
1. establishes the factual background of the case regarding compensation due to a vehicular accident. (Para 1 , 2)
2. highlights the argument for enhancement of compensation based on consortium. (Para 3 , 4)
3. details the court's observations on the evidence and assessment of income. (Para 5 , 6 , 8)
4. covers the court's reasoning for upholding tribunal's award and the principles governing compensation. (Para 7 , 9 , 10)
5. final conclusion dismissing the appeal. (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT

Nidhi Gupta, J.

Present appeal has been filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation of Rs.13,21,950/- granted by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ambala (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') vide Award dated 5.12.2018 passed in MACT Petition No.10 of 2017/2018 under section 166 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT ,1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). Claimants are the mother and two major brothers aged 23-1/2 years and 21 years respectively, of the deceased Sourabh Kumar who was aged 18 years at the time of his death.

2. Ld. Tribunal on the appraisal of facts, pleadings and evidence on record held that the deceased had died due to injuries suffered by him in motor v

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top