SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2785

ARCHANA PURI
Balram Shakti – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr.A.S.Gill, Advocate; For the Appellant
Mr.D.P.Gupta, Advocate for Respondent No.3.

JUDGMENT

Archana Puri, J.

The present appeal has been filed by the appellant-claimant, thereby, seeking enhancement of the compensation granted by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, vide Award dated 16.11.1997, on account of the injuries sustained by him, in a motor vehicular accident, which took place on 12.02.1994.

2. On appraisal of the evidence adduced, learned Tribunal had granted compensation to the extent of Rs.1.5 lakh to the appellant.

3. The essential facts, to be noticed are as follows:-

    That, on 12.02.1994, the appellant-claimant along with Sh.Gulshan Arora, Advocate and Sh.K.C.Sharma (respondent No.2) was proceeding to Chandigarh for briefing another lawyer, engaged by respondent No.2, in some civil revision petition. They were travelling in a Mahindra Jeep bearing registration No.PB-08J-0471, belonging to respondent No.2, which was driven by respondent No.1-Vijay Kumar. The appellant-claimant was sitting on the front seat. The driver of the jeep was driving the vehicle at a fast speed and when they reached near village Dahan Kaleran, another vehicle was seen coming from the opposite side and to avoid head-on collision, respondent No.1-driver of the jeep, steered h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top