SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2787

ARCHANA PURI
Amarjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Gopal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate; For the Petitioner

JUDGMENT

Mrs Archana Puri, J. (Oral)

Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated 27.04.2023 passed by learned Rent Controller, whereby an application filed by the petitioner, under Order 6, Rule 17 CPC, thereby seeking amendment of the petition under Section 13 -B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, had been dismissed.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that at first instance, the petitioner had filed a petition under Section 13 -B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, thereby seeking ejectment of the respondents from the demised premises, as she required the premises for her personal need. Further, it is submitted that during the pendency of the aforesaid petition, an application was filed at the behest of the petitioner, under Order 6, Rule 17 CPC, with regard to addition in paragraph No.4 (b) of the petition, thereby giving detail of the condition of the property and addition in paragraph No.4 (e), on the similar grounds. Furthermore, in the said application, a prayer was made for addition of 13 and' before the word 13-B'.

3. During the course of arguments, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top