Maya Rani vs Ranbir Singh - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 2841

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2841

ARUN MONGA
Maya Rani – Appellant
Versus
Ranbir Singh – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate for petitioners.
Mr. Krishan Singh, Advocate for Respondents No.1 to 3.
Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate for Respondent No.11.

Table of Content
1. focus on factual background of case. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's analysis of ownership and court fee. (Para 4)
3. assessing relief and court fee requirements. (Para 5)
4. conclusion and order on revision petition. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

Arun Monga, J. (Oral)

Petition herein is for setting aside order dated 31.05.2014 (Annexure P-1) passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri whereby petitioner-plaintiffs were directed to ad valorem Court fee on the amount of Rs.47,95,862/- in a suit for declaration and permanent injunction with consequential relief of mandatory injunction.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner-plaintiffs would contend that plaintiff No.4/proforma respondent No.12 entered into an agreement with defendants No.1 to 3 to sell land @ Rs.12,55,000/- per acre. An amount of Rs.6,00,000/- was paid as earnest money at the time of agreement to sell. Petitioners paid total sale consideration of Rs.46,90,562/- and spent Rs.1,00,000/- on stamp and registration. He would further contend that upon discovery, petitioners found that mutation No.2487 was entered in the name of defendant No.7 on the basis of sale-deed dated 28.08.2009 rega

Click Here to Read the rest of this document