SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1526

H. S. MADAAN
Parjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Rajinder Pal Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Jaideep Verma, Mr. P.S. Toor, Mr. Mohd. Yousaf, Mr. Namit Gautam

Judgment

Mr. H.S. Madaan, J.

Under challenge in this revision petition is the order dated 21.1.2016 passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Ludhiana in Civil Suit titled as ‘Parjeet Singh Versus Rajinder Pal Singh and others’ vide which while disposing of an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint having been moved by applicant/defendant No.45, the plaintiff was found liable to affix advalorem Court fee on the plaint as per the market value and a direction in that regard was given to him. The revision petitioner before this Court is plaintiff Parjeet Singh.

2. Briefly stated, facts of the case are that plaintiff Parjeet Singh by way of amended plaint had sought a decree for declaration that impugned sale deeds are null and void and as a consequential relief craving for possession of the suit property. In those proceedings, an application had been filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC by defendant No.45 for rejection of the plaint for the reason that advalorem Court fee was required to be affixed on the plaint, which had not been done.

3. The application was resisted by the plaintiff contending that all the sale deeds had been executed during pendency of the litigation a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top