IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ARUN MONGA, J.
Manmohan Singh (Since Deceased) – Revisionist
Versus
Varinder Singh – Respondent
CR NO. 2940 of 2023 (O&M)
Decided On : 12-05-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of ejectment application and procedural dismissal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for amendment based on concealment of facts. (Para 3) |
| 3. court analysis on procedural validity and due diligence requirements. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. rejection of the need for amendment in the written statement. (Para 10) |
| 5. final dismissal of the revision petition. (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT
Mr. Arun Monga, J. (Oral)
CRM-8861-CII-2023
For the reasons stated in application, same is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Main case (O&M)
Petition herein inter alia is for setting aside impugned order dated 20.04.2023 passed by learned Appellate Authority, Tarn Taran in RA/04/2018 titled as "Varinder Singh v. Manmohan Singh" whereby application of revisionists/ tenants under Order VI Rule 17 read with section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short 'CPC') seeking amendment in written statement dated 31.03.2016 (Annexure P-3), was dismissed.
2. The revision petition is premised on the averments that respondent herein/landlord filed application seeking ejectment of revisionist (since deceased and now represented by legal representatives) from demised premises on the ground of his being in arrears of rent for 12 months, and for bona fide need of his son.
2.1. Vide judgment/ order dated 09.07.2018 (Annexure P-1), learned Rent Controller dismissed the ejectment application. Respondent/landlord preferred appeal against aforesaid order. During pendency of appeal, revisionist(s) moved an application under Order VI Rule 17 read with section 151 CPC for amendment of written statement to incorporate entire details of business being run by son of landlord and concealment of facts by landlord at the time of filing the ejectment application.
2.2. Vide impugned order dated 20.04.2003, learned Appellate Authority dismissed the application.
3. Learned counsel for revisionists/tenants would contend that by way of amendment, they wanted to amend written statement by adding following lines at the end of para no.3 sub para (ii) of the written statement:
Amendments to rectify defects in pleadings regarding statutory provisions can be allowed at the initial stage of a case and do not change the nature of the petition.
Amendments to pleadings in appellate proceedings must be timely and bona fide, and should not prejudice the other party.
The court applied a liberal approach to amendment of pleadings, allowing legitimate and necessary amendments while distinguishing previous judgments on amendment of the plaint from the present case i....
The court emphasized the necessity for just and proper adjudication of the case and considered the genuineness and bonafide nature of the landlord's requirement in the context of amendment applicatio....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.