SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2118

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
G.S. SANDHAWALIA, HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN, JJ.
M/s. Ganesh Steel (India) – Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & Ors. – Respondents
CWP-11082 of 2023
Decided On : 31-10-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Mr.Pradhuman Garg, Advocate; For the Petitioner
Mr.Arjun Sheoran, DAG, Punjab.

The State cannot deny rightful refund claims based on the pending intention to appeal when substantial time has elapsed without action.

Headnote:(A) Punjab GST Act, 2017 - Section 107 - Refund petition - State Tax Officer denied refund of Rs.8,80,992/- citing pending appeal against the Appellate Authority's order - Though an appeal was not filed for over a year, the State failed to process the refund. (Paras 2, 5)

(B) Judicial Review - Courts should not permit delay tactics from State authorities to deny rightful claims for refund, especially when litigation has resulted in clear entitlements for the petitioner based on prior orders. (Paras 4)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to quash the order rejecting the refund of Rs.8,80,992/-, which was granted by an Appellate Authority over a tax penalty, but the State delayed proceedings and did not appeal for over a year.

Findings of Court:
The order of the State Tax Officer was quashed, and the State was directed to refund the amount within two weeks, with conditions for any subsequent recovery as per future proceedings.

Issues: Whether the State's delay in appealing justified the denial of the refund; the legality of withholding refunds when a clear order had been made in favor of the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court emphasized that the State cannot delay rightful refunds simply because it intends to file an appeal, and a lengthy period without action is not acceptable.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. tax refund application and previous appeal details (Para 1 , 2)
2. delays in state's appeal hinder rightful refund (Para 3 , 4)
3. quashing order and directions for refund (Para 5 , 6)

JUDGMENT

G.S. Sandhawalia, J. (Oral)

Prayer in the present writ petition, filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for quashing the order dated 28.04.2023 (Annexure P-3) whereby the State Tax Officer has declined the refund of Rs.8,80,992/- on the ground that the Department is in the process of filing an appeal against the order No. 881 dated 19.09.2022 of the Appellate Authority. Accordingly, the refund application was recommended to be rejected.

2. It is pertinent to mention that the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal), Patiala Division had allowed the appeal on 12.07.2022/19.09.2022 (Annexure P-1) under Section 107 of the Punjab GST Act/Central GST Act, 2017 read with Section 20 of the Integrated GST Act, 2017 against the order dated 05.09.2019 passed by Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Mobile Wing, Chandigarh-2 wherein there had been a tax penalty and fine under Section 130 of the Act to the tune of Rs.8,80,992/-.

3. Inspite of the fact that the order was never appealed against and a period of more than 1 year 4 months have almost gone by, the State has chosen not to refund the amount while passing the impugned order. The writ petition first came up for hearing on 03.07.2023 and an opportunity was given to the State to submit whether an appeal had been filed or not. More time was taken on 21.07.2023 and 29.09.2023 and proceedings had been deferred. However, the appeal has still not been filed.

4. In such circumstances, it is clear that the State is only dilly delaying on the issue and merely on account of the fact that the State is in the process of filing an appeal, we do not feel that the State is justified in divesting the petitioner of his fruits of litigation which have accrued to him despite a period of 1 year 3 months having gone by.

5. Resultantly, we quash the said order dated 28.04.2023 (Annexure P-3) and direct the State to refund the amount due within 2 weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order. Needless to say that as and when any order is passed in favour of the State in further proceedings, the said directions of refund would not stand in the way to recover the amount refunded.

6. The present writ petition stands allowed in the above-said terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top