IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J.
Harsher Singh & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
CRM-M-52152 of 2022 (O&M)
Decided On : 21-03-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of forged revenue records (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments for and against bail (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. observation of land possession discrepancies (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. decision on differentiating bail based on gender (Para 12) |
| 5. final order of bail decision (Para 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT
Gurvinder Singh Gill, J. (Oral)
This order shall dispose of aforesaid 2 petitions i.e. CRM-M-52152-2022 filed on behalf of Harsher Singh, Ramandeep Kaur & Rimplejeet Kaur as well as CRM-M-59005-2022 filed on behalf of Ranjit Singh @ Ranjit Singh Patwari, seeking grant of anticipatory bail in respect of a case registered vide FIR No.20 dated 19.10.2022 at Police Station Vigilance Bureau Range, Amritsar, under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Sections 420 , 465, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC.
2. The allegations, in nutshell, are that land comprised in Khasra Murabba No.42 min, Village Darya Mansoor, Tehsil Ajnala, District Amritsar falls under the course of Ravi river and is owned by Punjab Government's Reclamation and Rehabilitation Department. River Ravi keeps on changing its course and sometimes the river flows over the said land and sometimes changes its course. Out of the total of 207 kanals of said land, land measuring 160 kanals is shown to be in possession of Brijnev Singh and Harsher Singh ever since before the year 1988. But as a matter of fact, 80 kanals of the said land has been proved to be in possession of complainant - Sukha Singh since the last 3-4 years, who had installed his tubewell, tap for irrigation and has been cultivating the said land. However, Brijnev Singh had been claiming that he had sold the said land to Sukhdeep Singh in the year 2009, but till date Brijnev Singh or Harsher Singh could not furnish any proof. Bachittar Singh father of Brijnev Singh and Harsher Singh had died on 24.03.2016. As per report No.176 dated 28.01.2020 issued by Tehsildar Ajnala to S.D.M. Ajnala, Amritsar, also it is Sukha Singh, who is stated to be in cultivating possession. About 47 kanals of land out of the total land measuring about 200 kanals comprised in khasra Murabba No.42 min, is shown in possession of Sukhdev Singh since the last 18-19 years.
3. Brijnev Singh, Harsher Singh, Sukhjit Singh and his two sons Prabhdeep Singh and Ravdeep Singh in connivance with three Patwaris namely Dalbir Singh, Ranjit Singh and Lakhbir Singh, who all had remained posted within the area of Patwar Circle Araji Daria, prepared a fake Girdawari rectification while referring to a fake case No.143 dated 25.11.2015, got recorded a roznamcha report No.139 dated 13.01.2015 in respect of land measuring 80 kanals from 2015 onwards, so as to show Brijnev Singh and Ramandeep Kaur wife of Harsher Singh to be in possession in the revenue record. It is further alleged that another piece of land measuring 80 kanals was shown to be in khasra Girdawari in the name of Prabhdeep Singh, Ravdeep Singh sons of Sukhjit Singh during the period 2010 to 2015.
4. It is further alleged that the accused in connivance with Patwari Ranjit Singh and Patwari Lakhbir Singh got recorded report No.361 dated 10.08.2016 in the revenue record/Girdawari pertaining to the aforesaid 160 kanals on the basis of another fake Girdawari rectification No.28 dated 29.09.2015 and the names of Brijnev Singh, Ramandeep Kaur, Prabhdeep Singh and Ravdeep Singh were shown in the Girdawari register for the year 2010-2015 and with respect to Haadi 2016 and also got the same recorded in jamabandi for the year 2014-2015 in the column of cultivator/possession, whereas as a matter of fact it was Sukha Singh, who was in possession of 80 kanals of land and who had been cultivating the same. It is further alleged that similarly during the tenure of Patwari Dalbir Singh, entry regarding Girdawari rectification was entered vide report No.54 dated 21.10.2013 on the basis of a fake Girdawari rectification case No.136 dated 18.03.2013 and entries were recorded in respect of the same pieces of land
The seriousness of economic offences, the deliberate design and cool calculation involved, and the need for a different approach in the matter of bail for economic offences.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the decision to grant anticipatory bail was based on the lack of substantial evidence linking the petitioner to the alleged offenses and incon....
The court granted bail based on the prolonged custody of the petitioner and the nature of evidence being documentary, mitigating the risk of tampering.
The seriousness of economic offenses and the need for a different approach in bail matters, as highlighted in relevant legal provisions and interpretations, influenced the court's decision to dismiss....
The court held that allegations of forgery and conspiracy against revenue officers necessitate a trial, as their actions involved potential criminal liability despite claims of following official dut....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.