SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 987

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, N.S. SHEKHAWAT, JJ.
State of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Raghbir Singh & Ors. – Respondents
CRA-D-420-DBA of 2001 (O&M)
Decided On : 08-05-2024

Advocates Appeared:
Ms. Sheenu Sura, DAG, Haryana; For the Appellant-State of Haryana in CRA-D-420-DBA-2001 & for the respondent - State of Haryana in CRA-S-990-SB-2000 & CRA-S-1091-SB-2000.
Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate; For the Appellantin CRA-S-990-SB-2000 and for Respondent No.6 in CRA-D-420-DBA-2001.
Mr. Karan Pathak, Advocate; For the Appellantin CRA-S-1091-SB-2000 and for Respondent No.1 CRA-D-420-DBA-2001.

The court upheld the conviction of three accused under Section 412 IPC based on recovered stolen items, while acquitting others due to insufficient evidence and lack of identification.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 412 - Conviction for dacoity - Accused convicted for offence under Section 412 IPC with sentences of rigorous imprisonment and fines imposed - Acquittal of remaining accused for offences under Sections 332, 353, 395, 397, and 307 IPC due to lack of identification and evidence - Conviction upheld for three accused based on recovery of stolen articles identified by complainants. (Paras 12, 13, 14, 16)

(B) Acquittal - The prosecution failed to establish charges against remaining accused due to insufficient evidence and identification issues - The court upheld the trial court's findings regarding acquittal. (Paras 12, 13)

Facts of the case:
The appeals arise from a judgment convicting three accused for dacoity under Section 412 IPC, while the remaining accused were acquitted of all charges due to lack of evidence and identification. (Paras 2, 8)

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the conviction of three accused for Section 412 IPC based on the recovery of stolen items, while dismissing the appeal against acquitted accused for lack of evidence. (Paras 14, 16)

Issues: The main issues were the identification of accused during the dacoity and the sufficiency of evidence to support the charges against all accused. (Paras 12, 13)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the prosecution failed to prove the identity of the accused beyond reasonable doubt for the acquitted charges, while the conviction for Section 412 IPC was justified based on recovered evidence. (Paras 13, 14)

Result: Appeals accepted in part, reducing sentences for convicted accused. (Para 16)

JUDGMENT

Mr. Gurvinder Singh Gill, J.

This judgment shall dispose of the aforsaid three appeals which are directed against the same very judgment dated 12.9.2000 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad.

2. While CRA-S-990-SB-2000 & CRA-S-1091-SB-2000 have been filed by the accused Raghbir, Gattan @ Riyasat and Khichu, who stand convicted for having committed offence under Section 412 of Indian Penal Code, CRA-D- 420-DBA-2001 has been filed on behalf of State of Haryana challenging acquittal of the aforesaid accused in respect of charges under Sections 332, 353, 395, 397 and 307 IPC and complete acquittal of the remaining remaining accused. Vide judgment dated 12.9.2000 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad, accused Raghbir, Gattan @ Riyasat and Khichu have been sentenced as under:

Name of the Convict/s

Offence Under Section/s

Imprisonment

Fine

In default of payment of fine

Raghbir

412 IPC

Rigorous Imprisonment for Seven Years

Rs. 5,000/-

R.I. for One year

Gattan @ Riyasat

412 IPC

Rigorous Imprisonment for Seven Years

Rs. 5,000/-

R.I. for One year

Khichu

412 IPC

Rigorous Imprisonment for Four Years

Rs. 3,000/-

R.I. for 9 months

3. The FIR in question came to be lodged on the basis of statement (Ex.PT) made by Gautam Chand on 3.6.1992, wherein it is alleged that on the night intervening 2.6.1992 and 3.6.1992 he went to sleep on the roof of his house as usual. However, during midnight he heard noises of a door being pushed. The complainant woke up and saw that 10-12 persons armed with weapons like axes etc. had entered into his house after breaking open the door and were beating children and the said persons were looting household articles as well as gold ornaments. After looting the house of complainant, the said persons entered into house of complainant's neighbour namely Babu Ram and committed dacoity therein as well. It is further the case of prosecution that pursuant to receipt of said information, the police rushed to the spot and had an encounter with the dacoits during the course of which Constable Vinay sustained gunshot injuries. It is alleged that the dacoits injured several other police officials and managed to escape from the spot. Investigation was conducted by the police, during the course of which cartridges were recovered from the spot; rough site plan of the place of occurrence was prepared and statement of witnesses were recorded.

4. On 29.6.1992, the police received information that 19 persons had committed dacoity in the house of Gautam Chand and Babu Ram and that the said persons had moved to Uttar Pradesh (UP) from Haryana on a tractor. The police conducted raids at several places and was able to intercept Massey- Fergusson tractor bearing registration No.UP-81-9284. The occupants of the said tractor were arrested and their search was effected leading to recovery of 3 gold coins from the possession of one Sapeeha, which were taken into possession by the police vide recovery memo Ex.PG. Three gold bangles were recovered from possession of one Fakruddin, while another 2 gold bangles were recovered from possession of Ram Kishore, which were taken into possession by the police vide recovery memos Ex.PF and PE, respectively.

5. It is further the case of prosecution that on 19.8.1992, accused Raghbir appeared before the police and produced a pair of gold ear-rings and 4 gold buttons, which were taken into possession by the police vide recovery memo Ex.PCC. The aforesaid recovered articles were duly identified by complainant Gautam Chand and Babu Ram as belonging to them. On 9.9.1992, a raid was conducted at the houe of Gattan, who was arrested and pursuant to his disclosure statement, he got recovered a pair of 'Kandula' one pair of 'pajeb' and one Hassali, which were taken into possession vide recovery memo Ex.PFF on 17.9.1992. He (Gattan) further disclosed that he had handed over some of the looted properties to his relativ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top