Back
HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Irfan – Appellant
Versus
State of Union Territory, Chandigarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for parole following conviction (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. rejection of parole request with cited reasons (Para 4) |
| 3. arguments against the denial of parole (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. conditions for parole eligibility outlined (Para 9 , 11) |
| 5. critique of lack of justifiable reasons for denial (Para 10) |
| 6. order for granting parole with conditions (Para 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT
Harinder Singh Sidhu, J.
This is a petition for grant of parole.
2. It is stated in the petition that the petitioner was tried, convicted and sentenced by the Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Chandigarh to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 30 years under Section 376D IPC and 2 years under Section 506 IPC vide judgment and order dated 27/31.08.2018, in case FIR No.411 dated 18.11.2017 Police Station Sector-36, Chandigarh. The appeal against conviction (CRA-877-DB-2018) of the petitioner is pending in the High Court.
3. The petitioner filed an application before the Authorities for his release on parole, which has been rejected vide the impugned order dated 22.05.2021 passed by Inspector General of Prisons, UT, Chandigarh.
4. Vide the impugned order, the IG (Prisons) on report from the District Magistrate, Amb
The decision emphasized the statutory framework governing temporary release of prisoners and the limitations on authorities' discretion in denying parole.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
