IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, LALIT BATRA, JJ.
Banarsi Lal – Petitioner
Versus
Chandigarh Administration & Ors. – Respondents
CWP-20451 of 2022 (O&M)
Decided On : 25-01-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed for quashing lease cancellation orders. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. petitioner argues ignorance and bona fide belief affecting compliance. (Para 10 , 12 , 16) |
| 3. cancellation of lease viewed as harsh; considerations for livelihood. (Para 11 , 15 , 19) |
| 4. rule 14(2) is directory; cancellation not inevitable. (Para 17 , 20) |
| 5. petition allowed; lease restoration ordered. (Para 22) |
JUDGMENT
Mr. Harinder Singh Sidhu, J.
This petition has been filed for quashing the orders: Annexure P-2 dated 12.08.2009, P-4 dated 18.05.2010 and P-6 dated 10.07.2013 pertaining to cancellation of lease of built up booth No.155, Sector 20-C, Chandigarh on the ground of non-execution of lease deed.
2. The petitioner was allotted built up booth No.155, Sector 20-C, Chandigarh on lease hold basis for 99 years vide allotment letter dated 03.02.1997 (Annexure P-1) under the rehabilitation scheme known as "Allotment/Transfer of built up Booths in any Sector on Lease/Hire Purchase basis in Chandigarh Rules, 1991".
3. As per the allotment letter, the allotment was to be governed by the provisions of 'Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act,1952' and the Rules made thereunder and the provisions of 'Chandigarh Lease Hold of Sites and Building Rules, 1973' (herein for short 1973 Rules')
4. The allotment was made on total premium of Rs.71,000/-. This amount included the cost of land amounting to Rs.30,000/- and the cost of structure amounting to Rs.41,000/-.
5. 50% of the cost of the structure i.e. Rs.20,500/- was to be paid within 10 days of the issue of the allotment letter. The remaining 50% was to be paid in two annual equated instalments along with interest i.e., Rs. 13,094/-. 25% of the cost of land i.e. Rs.7500/- was to be deposited within 30 days of the issue of allotment letter. The remaining 75% was to be paid in three annual equated instalments along with interest i.e. Rs.10,019/- each. In addition to the premium the annual ground rent that was payable was also specified in the allotment letter.
6. As per clause no.8 of the allotment letter the petitioner allottee was required to execute a lease deed after the expiry of one month from the date of allotment in such manner as may be directed by the Estate Officer.
7. It is the case of the petitioner that after the allotment of booth the petitioner started running his business of ready-made garments in it and he continued paying all the instalments of premium along with interest.
8. As per Rule 14 (1) of the 1973 Rules after payment of 25% of the premium the lessee is required to execute lease deed in such manner as may be directed by the Estate Officer within six months of the date of allotment or such further period as the Estate Officer may for good and sufficient reasons allow. Failure to execute the lease deed attracts the penal provisions contained in Rule 14(2) of the said rules. Rule 14 is as under:
9. As the petitioner/lessee failed to execute the lease deed within the aforesaid period, show-cause notice dated 05-09-2002 was issued to him by the respondent No.3- Estate Officer, U.T. Chandigarh as per provisions contained in Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) (Service of Notices) Rules,1974.
10. It is contended on behalf of the peti
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the cancellation of government lease, governed by statutory regulations, can be justified if the allotment was obtained by misrepresentation o....
Express conditions in a lease must be strictly adhered to; violation justifies cancellation based on section 111(g) of the Transfer of Property Act.
Non-payment of lease salami within stipulated time does not automatically cancel allotment; requires active governmental cancellation, establishing a directory interpretation of time limits.
The Housing Board's cancellation of plot allotment was invalid due to lack of notice and failure to follow due process, violating principles of natural justice.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.