Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
Rahul Bajpai S/o Late Shri Pandit Rohini Kumar Bajpai – Appellant
Versus
Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Narendra Kumar Vyas, J.
1. This first appeal under Section 96 CPC has been filed by appellant/ plaintiff assailing the judgment and decree dated 30.04.2016 passed by learned 5th Additional District Judge, Bilaspur in Civil Suit No. 24-A of 2013, by which the trial Court has dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiff for declaration that no provision of lease deed has been violated, therefore, the defendant has no right to dispossess the plaintiff from the suit property.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to in terms of Civil Suit No. 24-A/2013.
3. Brief averments as pleaded in the plaint are as under:-
(a) That the appellant is the proprietor of M/s. R.K. Udyog, the said company was involved in production of Aluminum Notch Bars and supply the same to small scale steel plants. A lease deed was executed between M/s. R.K. Udyog and defendant for admeasuring 3600 Sq. feet land situated at Tifra Industrial Estate, District Bilaspur, The said land is hereinafter referred to as “suit land”.
(b) It is contended that the lease deed was executed between the appellant and the defendant twice. First lease deed was executed between the appellant and the defendant
Express conditions in a lease must be strictly adhered to; violation justifies cancellation based on section 111(g) of the Transfer of Property Act.
The unilateral cancellation of a registered lease deed is illegal if it does not comply with the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act, specifically Section 111, and lease rights persist despite....
Petitioner lacked locus standi to challenge a private lease under the U.P. Revenue Code, as only parties with direct interests may bring such claims.
(1) When lessee is given benefit of such property and breach of condition imposed is alleged, strict construction of forfeiture clause against lessor in all circumstances would not arise as otherwise....
Lease agreements with clauses allowing eviction can exempt parties from notice requirements under Section 106 of the T.P. Act.
A valid notice to quit under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act is mandatory to terminate a tenancy, regardless of original lease terms dispensing with such notice.
Tenancy rights and renewal conditions defined under the Transfer of Property Act, emphasizing statutory tenancy post-expiration.
The court affirmed that a party cannot use writ jurisdiction to enforce contractual obligations, which must instead be pursued through appropriate civil or arbitration channels.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
