Back
HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, LALIT BATRA
Kunal Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allottees' claims regarding project development status (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. orders regarding construction payment plans (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. right to a hearing before order modification (Para 11 , 12 , 14 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. arguments on jurisdiction and review powers (Para 15 , 18 , 20) |
| 5. petitioners allowed to represent before director (Para 21 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. no opinion expressed on claims (Para 25) |
JUDGMENT
Harinder Singh Sidhu, J.
This order shall dispose of both the above petitions as the issues raised therein are the same. For convenience the facts are being referred to from CWP No. 22104 of 2022.
2. The petitioners are allottees of the 'Affordable Group Housing Project' floated by respondents No. 4 to 6 by the name Mahira Homes, situated in Sector 63 A and Sector 95, village Bhrampur, Gurugram.
3. They have filed this petition praying for quashing the order dated 26.8.2022 (Annexure P-9) passed by the Director Town and Country Planning, Haryana ("the Director"). By this order which is purportedly in continuation of the earlier order dated 21.7.2022 (Annexure P-7) the request of the colonizer (respondents No. 4 to 6) to allow raising demand as per the origina
The Housing Board's cancellation of plot allotment was invalid due to lack of notice and failure to follow due process, violating principles of natural justice.
The court affirmed that applicants under a housing scheme are bound by the terms they accepted, including payment obligations, and cannot contest cost escalations due to delays not promised by the Bo....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
